Foamstars has ignited a wave of frustration among gamers due to its pricing strategy for in-game cosmetic sets. While the game was initially available for free on PlayStation Plus until March 4, it is now set to be sold at $29.99, yet it continues to adopt a monetization approach typically associated with free-to-play titles.
Read Also: Subnautica 2 Makers Tackle Misconceptions about Live Service Features
High Prices Yet Limited Options
The crux of player dissatisfaction revolves around the microtransaction prices, which many perceive as exorbitant. The cosmetic sets, some priced at $45, have raised eyebrows among the player base, with concerns over the financial burden for those seeking to acquire a comprehensive collection of in-game items.
This pricing model has drawn particular criticism, as it diverges from the standard approach observed in traditional paid games.
THERE IS NO WAY THE COSMETICS COST THIS MUCH
— Ultima Reload (@UltimaShadowX) February 8, 2024
Subscription Costs and Player Concerns
Even during its free PlayStation Plus period, Foamstars still incurred costs for players. The subscription fee, priced at a minimum of $9.99 per month or $79.99 per year on the Essential tier, adds an additional layer of expenditure for those interested in continuing the gaming experience beyond the initial promotional period. Players are now faced with the decision of maintaining the subscription or purchasing the game outright for $29.99.
Despite launching on February 6, Foamstars has encountered a mixed reception from both players and critics, reflected in its current Metacritic score of 59. A significant portion of the reviews has spotlighted dissatisfaction with the pricing of microtransactions. The critical feedback raises questions about the longevity of such a model and the potential impact on the game's player base.
Related Article: Roblox Expects 2024 to Deliver Hefty Revenues Alongside Substantial Losses
