Two first-person shooters hit the shelves lately: the "Battlefield 1" and the "Titanfall 2." Both games were highly anticipated by video gamers this year, and based on the early reviews, both seem to hit it off very well on the first days, although Titanfall 2 is reportedly suffering low gamership out of the gate.
While both appear promising as two of the year's premiere FPS games, which game is better for you? Here's everything you need to know about "Battlefield 1" and "Titanfall 2:" its selling points, salient features, gaming modes and more.
Battle of the shooters
Firstly, "Battlefield 1" and "Titanfall 2" both exist on Xbox One, PlayStation, and PC, so there's really no competition when it comes to platform availability. The difference between both games lie, however, in their gaming modes. Battlefield 1's top selling point, for example, is its unequaled battlefield scales that almost equal that of a war simulation, according to GameRevolution.
Its fresh take on World War I and the challenges of using 20th century firearms and weapons without compromising power and strength ups the ante for "Battlefield 1." "Titanfall 2," on the other hand, prides itself in its action-oriented gameplay. It places emphasis on characters' physical abilities, such as double jump, hover and wall-running. Moreover, it also executed piloting mechs perfectly and seamlessly.
Disadvantages
However, both games are not without fault. "Battlefield 1," for one, is reported to have some bugginess during the first part of the campaign, while its maps aren't exactly its strongest point, according to IGN. Another IGN review for "Titanfall 2," on the other hand, took notice of its predictability and sometimes stilted dialogue. Obviously these faults are forgivable enough, however, for both "Battlefield 1" and "Titanfall 2" to score 9/10 from Trusted Reviews.
"Battlefield 1" will cost around $59.99 as well as "Titanfall 2." Stay tuned to GamenGuide for more "Battlefield 1" news and updates!
